Results
SPECapc
Download/Order
Resources
|
The Application Performance
Characterization
Project Committee Rules
V1.20
Last Updated: 10/15/2003
- Overview
- General Philosophy
- Within SPEC's Graphics Performance Characterization
(GPC) Group there was a strong belief that it is important
to benchmark graphics performance based on actual applications.
Application-level benchmarks exist, but they are not
standardized and they do not cover a wide range of application
areas. Thus, the Application Performance Characterization
(SPECapcSM) Project was created within
the GPC to create a broad-ranging set of standardized
benchmarks for graphics-intensive applications.
- The SPECapc seeks to develop benchmarks for generating
accurate application-level graphics performance measures
in an open, accessible and well-publicized manner.
- The SPECapc wishes to contribute to the coherence
of the field of application performance measurement
and evaluation so that vendors will be better able to
present well-defined performance measures and customers
will be better able to compare and evaluate vendors
products and environments.
- The SPECapc will provide formal beta benchmarks to
members and final benchmark releases to the public in
a timely fashion.
- Hardware and software used to run the SPECapc benchmarks
must provide a suitable environment for running typical
(not just benchmark) workloads for the applications
in question.
- SPECapc reserves the right to adapt its benchmarks
as it deems necessary to preserve its goal of fair and
useful benchmarking (e.g. remove benchmark, modify benchmark
code or data, etc). If a change is made to the suite,
SPECapc will notify the appropriate parties (i.e. SPECapc
members and users of the benchmark) and SPECapc will
re-designate the benchmark by changing its name and/or
version. In the case that a benchmark is removed in
whole or in part, SPECapc reserves the right to republish
in summary form "adapted" results for previously published
systems, converted to the new metric. In the case of
other changes, such a republication may necessitate
re-testing and may require support from the original
test sponsor.
- Overview of Optimizations
- SPECapc is aware of the importance of optimizations
in producing the best system performance. SPECapc is
also aware that it is sometimes hard to draw an exact
line between legitimate optimizations that happen to
benefit SPECapc benchmarks and optimizations that specifically
target SPECapc benchmarks. However, with the list below,
SPECapc wants to increase awareness of implementers
and end-users to issues of unwanted benchmark-specific
optimizations that would be incompatible with SPECapc's
goal of fair benchmarking.
- To ensure that results are relevant to end-users,
SPECapc expects that the hardware and software implementations
used for running SPECapc benchmarks adhere to a set
of general rules for optimizations.
- General Rules for Optimization
- Optimizations must generate correct images and results
for the application under test, for both the benchmark
case and similar cases. Correct images and results are
those deemed by the majority of the SPECapc electorate,
potentially with input from the associated independent
software vendor (ISV) and/or end-users, to be sufficiently
adherent to the intent behind the application.
- Optimizations must improve performance for a class
of workloads where the class of workloads must be larger
than a single SPECapc benchmark or SPECapc benchmark
suite.
- For any given optimization a system should generate
correct images with and without said optimization. An
optimization should not reduce system stability.
- The vendor encourages the implementation for general
use (not just for running a single SPECapc benchmark
or SPECapc benchmark suite).
- The implementation is generally available, documented
and supported by the providing vendor.
- In the case where it appears that the above guidelines
have not been followed, SPECapc may investigate such
a claim and request that the optimization in question
(e.g. one using SPECapc benchmark-specific pattern matching)
be removed and the results resubmitted. Or, SPECapc
may request that the vendor correct the deficiency (e.g.
make the optimization more general purpose or correct
problems with image generation) before submitting results
based on the optimization.
- It is expected that system vendors would endorse the
general use of these optimizations by customers who
seek to achieve good application performance.
- No pre-computed (e.g. driver-cached) images, geometric
data, or state may be substituted within an SPECapc
benchmark on the basis of detecting that said benchmark
is running (e.g. pattern matching of command stream
or recognition of benchmark's name).
- Membership
- Membership
- Membership in the SPECapc is open to any organization
that has a direct and/or material interest in graphics-focused
application benchmarking.
- Members are expected but not required to be active
participants developing and improving SPECapc benchmarks.
- Members are entitled to secure access to development
code.
- Members are entitled to unlimited publication rights.
- New members become eligible for voting on the 2nd
consecutive qualified meeting. The first qualified meeting
may have been attended prior to becoming a member.
- A member maintains voting rights by attending 1 out
of the last 3 qualified meetings. A member loses their
voting rights upon missing 3 consecutive qualified meetings.
- A member regains voting rights on attending a second
consecutive qualified meeting.
- Associate Status
- Associate status is available to non-profit organizations.
- All SPECapc, GPC and SPEC rights and rules apply to
Associates unless specifically stated otherwise.
- Associates are entitled to secure access to development
code.
- Associates do not have voting rights.
- Officers and Elections
- On an annual basis the SPECapc will elect from its
membership the following officers:
- Chairperson
- Vice Chairperson
- Secretary-Treasurer
- The Chairperson's responsibilities are to
- conduct meetings,
- send out the agenda on time,
- conduct votes on time,
- deal with outside organizations such as the press,
- police the submission, review and appeal processes.
- The Vice Chairperson's responsibility is to do the
chairman's job when the chairman is not available.
- The Secretary-Treasurer responsibilities are to:
- record minutes,
- maintain the rules document,
- keeps a history of email,
- track finances and interact with the GPC and SPEC
Board in that regard.
- Meetings
- The SPECapc has three types of meetings (not including
sub-committee meetings)
- Regular quarterly meetings
- Special SPECapc face-to-face meetings for the
full membership
- Conference call meetings
- Meetings which qualify for attendance only include:
- Face-to-face meetings scheduled one month in advance
- Conference call meetings scheduled at least two
weeks in advance which are indicated as qualified
at least two weeks in advance.
- Membership Dues and Billing
- Dues for the SPECapc will be set annually by the SPEC
Board of Directors with input from the SPECapc. Once
set, the dues amount will be recorded in the SPEC minutes
and communicated to the SPECapc by the SPEC office.
- Payment of dues for a given calendar year must be
received at the SPEC office by March 1st of that year.
Alternately, a Letter of Intent to join the SPECapc
must be received by the SPEC office by March 1st of
that year with a subsequent dues payment by May 1st
of that year. Failure to meet these deadlines will result
in loss of membership and voting rights which will be
reinstated when full payment is received at the SPEC
office.
- Non-Member Publication
- The SPECapc will accept submissions from non-members
for review and publication on the SPEC public website.
- Non-member submissions must follow the same rules
and procedures as member submissions.
- Non-members are not eligible to participate in reviewing
results.
- Non-members will be charged per system configuration
for their submissions. Any change in hardware or software
constitutes a new configuration.
- On an annual basis the SPECapc will establish the
pricing and periods for non-member publication. These
will be recorded in the SPECapc minutes and published
on the GPC web site.
- The SPECapc project group may remove current published
results due to benchmark revision. In this case, the
submitter will be given notice by the project
group and may, at no charge, resubmit the identical
configuration for the revised benchmark.
- Benchmarks
- Benchmark Acceptance
- Benchmark components are defined as
- specific revision of an application,
- run rules, scripts and associated data sets.
- New or modified benchmark components require a 2/3-majority
vote to be accepted for publication. Selection of datecode
versions of a specific revision of an application is
by majority vote.
- A minimum 3-week review period is required for new
or significantly modified benchmark components.
- At the end of the review period a vote will be called
to approve the proposed changes.
- An amendment to a benchmark component during the review
period must be unanimously accepted. If not, the review
period shall be restarted.
- Benchmark Code Versioning
- Benchmarks use the following version coding: M.m (e.g.
SPECapcSM for Pro/ENGINEER� 20.0 v1.1) M
is the major release number and m is the minor release
number.
- The major release number is only incremented when
large amounts of code are changed and the scripting
language is dramatically changed as a result -- backward
compatibility is highly unlikely when moving scripts
or data sets between major releases (e.g. running v2
scripts on a v3 executable would almost certainly fail).
- The minor release number is bumped if some small set
of code is replaced or removed - but the standard, unchanged
scripts and data sets, as a whole, must run on the new
version (but perhaps with different performance).
- When there is a new major release of a benchmark,
submissions using the previous release will be accepted
for at least one submission cycle.
- Submission, Review and Publication
- Submission Preparation Rules
- The rules for the submission and review cycle to be
used are those posted on the SPECapc web site two weeks
prior to the submission deadline.
- The benchmark and application versions to be used
for a submission are those posted on the SPECapc web
site two weeks prior to the submission deadline.
- All benchmark sources for a submission must be the
same as that posted on the SPECapc web site two weeks
prior to the submission deadline.
- Members who wish not to review the submission of other
specific members due to conflict of interest must submit
that list to the SPEC office prior to the submission
deadline. The SPEC office will hold the conflict of
interest list in confidence from other members.
- General Benchmark Run Rules
- The system under test must correctly perform all of
the operations being requested by the application during
the benchmark.
- No changes to any files associated with the benchmark
are permitted excepted as noted in the benchmark-specific
rules (section 5 of this document).
- The entire display raster must be available for use
by the application being benchmarked.
- It is not permissible to override the intended behavior
of the application through any means including, but
not limited to, registry settings or environment variables.
- No interaction is allowed with the system under test
during the benchmark, unless required by the benchmark.
- The system under test can not skip frames during the
benchmark run.
- It is not permissible to change the system configuration
during the running of a given benchmark. That is, one
can't power off the system, make some changes, then
power back on and run the rest of the benchmark.
- Results submitted must be obtained using the scripts,
models, and application revisions which are specified
for that submission cycle by the SPECapc.
- The monitor used in the benchmark must support the
stated resolution and refresh rate.
- The benchmark must successfully obtain all requested
window sizes, with no reduction or clipping of any benchmark-related
windows. Windows created by the benchmark must
not be obscured on the screen by anything other than
other elements created by the benchmark.
- Tests may be run with or without a desktop/window
manager if the application allows this, but must be
run on some native windowing system.
- General Submission Content Rules
- The information supplied should reflect the SYSTEM
AS TESTED.
- All fields in the of the result files must be
supplied by the submitter unless they are marked as
"opt.", indicating an optional field.
- Submitters must specify a date for 'General Availability'
that is accurate for the entire system - hardware, software,
O/S, drivers, etc.
- The "Comments" area of the results page must describe
how the system may be acquired.
- Date fields should always contain a valid date. "Now"
is not valid in a date field - the field should instead
indicate the earliest date of availability.
- Price includes system and monitor as tested.
- The color depth used must be at least 24 bits (true
color), with at least 8 bits of red, 8 bits of green
and 8 bits of blue.
- If a depth buffer is requested, it must have at least
16 bits of resolution.
- The display raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- Alternate currency from the US dollar can be submitted
as price and the submission will sort separately on
the summary pages for Price and Price/Performance.
- The submitter is required to declare sufficient information
to reproduce the performance claimed. This includes
but is not limited to:
- non-default environment variables,
- non-default registry variables,
- hints,
- changes to the standard makefiles.
- Any information required to be reported such as non-default
environment variables, registry variables or hints,
that does not have a predefined field must be documented
in the "Comments" or "API Extensions" areas of the results
page.
- Valid submissions must include screen captures if
required by the benchmark.
- Results previously published for a system can be resubmitted.
- Previously published results being re-submitted can
only have price changes.
- The submission upload file structures are defined
in the benchmark-specific section below.
- Each member company should ensure that the upload
file contains data for all the new configurations and
existing published configurations they wish to continue
publishing.
- Standardized cache nomenclature are as follows:
- (D+I) is a Unified instruction and data cache
- (D/I) is a for separate instruction and data caches
- A number followed by KB or MB can be used to describe
the size of the cache.
- Caches dedicated to a processor are listed as
per-processor cache size.
- Caches shared by multiple processors are listed
by total size.
- Each component of the submitted software configuration
(including the graphics driver) shall be:
- uniquely identified,
- available to SPECapc members, upon demand, by
the submission deadline and for the duration of
the review process,
- available to the public by the publication date,
with continued availability at least through the
next submission deadline.
- On or before the date of publication the platform
as described in the submission shall be available for
purchase by the public, for the specified price or less,
with a firm delivery date of 60 days or less. Submissions
will be categorized as either �Single Supplier� or �Parts
Built�, where �Single Supplier� is defined as a configuration
where all hardware and drivers are sold and supported
by a single supplier. �Supported� is defined as providing
hardware and driver warranty for a defined period. �Parts
Built� is defined as a configuration built and supported
by multiple suppliers.
- �Parts built� system pricing must include enough detail
to reproduce all aspects of the submission, including
performance and price, and include all hardware and
O/S costs necessary to run the benchmark.
- Any change to or replacement of, subsequent to publication,
any of the elements of the submitted software configuration
that results in more than a 5% degradation in any of
the benchmark results for that submitted system will
be cause for removal of the results for that system
from the SPEC public website.
- Submission Process Rules
- Each benchmark is considered a separate submission.
- Submission of each benchmark's results (e.g., Pro/ENGINEER�
, Solidworks 2003�) will be in different tar/zip files.
- The submission file names are detailed below under
the benchmark-specific rules.
- A submitter of SPECapc benchmark results must upload
their submission to the proper location by the submission
deadline.
- The submitter must notify SPEC Office after a submission
is uploaded to the server prior to the submission deadline
with contact information for questions about the submission.
- The submitter must contact the SPEC office if they
have attempted to upload their submission and were not
successful.
- The SPEC office will not disclose who has submitted
results until the submission deadline has passed.
- Submissions will not be accepted after the submission
deadline.
- The upload directory will be set to write-only until
the submission deadline has passed. Then it is set to
read-write (not modify) after the submission deadline.
- If a submitter is notified that their submission format
is incorrect, they must re-send their submission in
proper format within 3 business days of notification.
- Abuse of the resubmission allowance is grounds for
rejection of a submission.
- Review Period Rules
- SPECapc members shall keep all submitted results confidential
until those results appear on the public SPEC website,
or until they become public through some other means.
SPECapc members are free to make their own submitted
results public at any time.
- SPEC Office pairs reviewers to submitters.
- The various SPECapc benchmark review pools will be
independent of each other. The SPEC office will send
the list of contact information for the submissions
under review.
- All members will have access to all benchmark submissions
once the review period begins.
- There will be a 5 calendar-day review period on submissions.
- Submissions can not be withdrawn after the submission
deadline.
- If a primary reviewer has a question with a submission
they must pose the question to the submitter first.
- Any reviewer/member who has any question with
a submission must either:
- Pose any questions to the submitter and cc the
primary reviewer.
- Pose any questions to the primary reviewer. The
primary reviewer must then pose the question(s)
to the submitter.
- Pose any questions to an officer of the SPECapc.
The officer of the SPECapc must then pose the question(s)
to the submitter and cc the primary reviewer.
- The submitter can request that their submission be
rejected on stated technical grounds.
- With the permission of the primary reviewer, the submitter
may resubmit their submission.
- The submitter must provide the primary reviewer access
to the system under test at the submitter's facilities
if requested by the reviewer during the review period.
The reviewer must state prior to the visit what part
of the submission is going to be verified. Travel expenses
are the responsibility of the reviewer.
- Previously published results being re-submitted can
only be reviewed for consistency with the previous submission
and price changes.
- Price can be challenged. If so, the submitter must
provide documentation that the system can be purchased
for the price quoted. Price must be valid for two submission
cycles from date of first publication. Quantity 1 pricing
must be used.
- Reviewers will decide if the image quality and results
of the submission are sufficiently correct with respect
to the intent of the ISV to satisfy the intended end-users'
expectations.
- The primary reviewer of a submission must either approve
the submission without comment, approve the submission
with comment or reject the submission with comment by
the end of the review period. If the primary reviewer
fails to do this, the submission will be automatically
accepted. The submitter may appeal a rejection as described
in "Review Appeal Rules" below.
- Any comments for rejection of a submission received
after the end of the review period will not affect or
delay publication of the submission.
- Review Appeal Rules
- There will be a 2-week appeal period following the
review period.
- During the appeal process, any submitters of rejected
submissions can make their case to the SPECapc via email.
- At the end of the appeal period, if there is no resolution
the Chair of the SPECapc will call for a vote to approve
or reject the submission.
- The whole SPECapc electorate votes on approval or
rejection of an appealed submission. A simple majority
of the SPECapc electorate is required to approve or
reject the appeal. In case of a tie the submission is
rejected.
- Challenging Approved Results
- Any member may challenge approved results at any time.
This includes
- archived results,
- currently published results and
- re-submitted results not subject to the regular
submission review process.
- The burden of proof that the result should be modified
is on the member who is challenging the result.
- The challenge must be ratified by a majority vote
of the SPECapc electorate.
- The Chair of the SPECapc will call a special review
cycle for a resubmission in the event that a current
submission is successfully challenged.
- Successful challenges of archived results can only
result in annotation, not removal or modification. Annotation
is determined by the majority of the SPECapc electorate.
- SPECapc Benchmark Specific Rules and Procedures
- Pro/Engineer* Release 20.0
- The benchmark must be run using the datecode version
of Pro/ENGINEER� specified on the SPECapc website two
weeks prior to the submission deadline.
- The config.pro file must be used as-is and may not
be modified or overridden.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Pro/ENGINEER� must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the HTML results page
as well as the corresponding "trailfile" that resulted
from running the benchmark.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe/results.htm(l)
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe/trail.txt
(may be compressed)
.../<Company-name/<system_2/proe/results.htm(l)
.../<Company-name/<system_2/proe/trail.txt
(may be compressed)
etc...
- Compression may be accomplished using UN*X compress(1),
tar -Z or zip. The reviewer may ask the submitter to
supply an uncompressed version of the trail file(s).
- The submission file must be named company_apc_proe20_vN.zip
or company_apc_proe20_vN.tar.z where company
is the member company or organization name in lower
case and vN is the file version (e.g. sgi_apc_proe20_v0.tar.z
and intel_apc_proe20_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Pro/Engineer* 2000i
- The benchmark must be run using the datecode version
of Pro/ENGINEER� specified on the SPECapc website two
weeks prior to the submission deadline.
- The config.pro file must be used as-is and may not
be modified or overridden.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Pro/ENGINEER� must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the HTML results page
as well as the corresponding "trailfile" that resulted
from running the benchmark.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe2000/results.htm(l)
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe2000/trail.txt
(may be compressed)
.../<Company-name/<system_2/proe2000/results.htm(l)
.../<Company-name/<system_2/proe2000/trail.txt
(may be compressed)
etc...
- Compression may be accomplished using UN*X compress(1),
tar -Z or zip. The reviewer may ask the submitter to
supply an uncompressed version of the trail file(s).
- The submission file must be named company_apc_proe2000_vN.zip
or company_apc_proe2000_vN.tar.z where
company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. sgi_apc_proe2000_v0.tar.z and intel_apc_proe20_v0.zip.)
The initial submission is v0. Resubmitted files must
have the version number incremented.
- Pro/Engineer* 2000i2
- The benchmark must be run using the datecode version
of Pro/ENGINEER 2000i2 specified on the SPECapc
website two weeks prior to the submission deadline.
- The config.pro file must be used as-is and may not
be modified or overridden.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Pro/ENGINEER must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the proe_results.txt file
(generated by the proe_score program) as well as the
corresponding "trailfile" that resulted from running
the benchmark.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe2000i2/proe_result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe2000i2/trail.txt
(may be compressed)
.../<Company-name/<system_2/proe2000i2/proe_result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/proe2000i2/trail.txt
(may be compressed)
etc...
- Compression may be accomplished using UN*X compress(1),
tar -Z or zip. The reviewer may ask the submitter to
supply an uncompressed version of the trail file(s).
- The submission file must be named company_apc_proe2000i2_vN.zip
or company_apc_proe2000i2_vN.tar.z where
company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. sgi_apc_proe2000i2_v0.tar.z and intel_apc_proe2000i2_v0.zip.)
The initial submission is v0. Resubmitted files must
have the version number incremented.
- Solidworks98Plus*
- The benchmark must be run using the datecode version
of Solidworks98Plus� specified on the SPECapc website
two weeks prior to the submission deadline.
- The color depth in the windows used by Solidworks
98Plus� must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels x 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the HTML results page.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/sw98plus/results.htm
.../<Company-name/<system_2/sw98plus/results.htm
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_sw98plus_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. fujitsu_apc_sw98plus_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Solidworks99*
- The benchmark must be run using the datecode version
of Solidworks99 specified on the SPECapc website two
weeks prior to the submission deadline.
- The color depth in the windows used by Solidworks99
must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels x 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the HTML results page.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/sw99/results.htm
.../<Company-name/<system_2/sw99/results.htm
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_sw99_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. compaq_apc_sw99_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Unigraphics V15.0.2
- The benchmark must be run using Unigraphics V15.0.2.
- The color depth in the windows used by Unigraphics
must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels x 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The application windows will be visible as specified:
- The "Unigraphics V15.0.2 � Gateway" window fills
the screen. No desktop is visible. However,
note that the "maximize" button on the title bar
is still enabled � the window has restored to a
nearly maximized size.
- The "Graphics" window now is contained entirely
within the top level "Unigraphics V15.0.2 � Gateway"
window.
- The "Graphics" window fills the height of the
"Unigraphics V15.0.2 � Gateway" window between
the toolbar and the information bar.
- The "Graphics" window does not fill the width
of the "Unigraphics V15.0.2 � Gateway" window.
- The "Graphics" window now has a border on all
four sides � including the right border.
- The submission must contain the XLS results page.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/ug15/results.xls
.../<Company-name/<system_2/ug15/results.xls
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_ug15_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. compaq_apc_ug15_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- 3ds max 3.1*
- The benchmark is supported on Windows NT 4.0 only.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
3ds max 3.1� must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The application windows will be visible as specified:
- The "3D Studio MAX R3.1" window is maximized and
fills the screen
(The window is not occluded by any other windows.)
- The command panel is visible and docked on the
right.
(The command panel is in the default UI position).
- Drivers and custom drivers must be configured (explicitly
or implicitly) to use:
- GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER = GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_LINEAR
GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER = GL_LINEAR
- Textures cannot be touched, i.e. not reduced in
size or depth.
- Wireframe objects must NOT be drawn using triangle
strips.
- Wireframe objects must be drawn with anti-aliased
lines.
- The following Viewport parameters must be checked
in the Viewport tab found in the 3ds max 3.1 Customize
-> Preferences menu:
- Backface cull on object creation
- Mask viewport to safe region
- Update background while playing
- Display world axis
- The following Viewport parameters must NOT be checked
in the Viewport tab found in the 3ds max 3.1 Customize
-> Preferences menu
- Attenuate lights
- Filter environment backgrounds
- The submission must contain the results file "generic.txt"
as well as the corresponding jpeg image "land.jpg" that
resulted from running the benchmark.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/3dsmax/generic.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/3dsmax/land.jpg
.../<Company-name/<system_2/3dsmax/generic.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/3dsmax/land.jpg
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_3ds_max_31_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. ibm_apc_3dsmax_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Solid Edge* V9
- The benchmark must be run using Solid Edge V9.
- The benchmark machine must have Microsoft Excel installed.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Solid Edge must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- Application settings must not be changed from the
defaults set by the benchmark installation.
Settings that must not be changed include, but
are not limited to:
- Culling
- Wireframe display in Move Part command
- Minimum Number of Lines representing an arc (8)
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the SolidEdge_Result.txt
and the 1532Times.xls files that are generated during
the benchmark process.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/SEV9/SolidEdge_Result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/SEV9/1532Times.xls
.../<Company-name/<system_2/SEV9/SolidEdge_Result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/SEV9/1532Times.xls
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_SolidEdge_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. hp_apc_SolidEdgeV10_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Unigraphics V17
- The benchmark must be run using Unigraphics V17.0.1
- The color depth in the windows used by Unigraphics
must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels x 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain both the XLS results page
and the .TXT file that it generates
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/ug17/results.xls
.../<Company-name/<system_1/ug17/results.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/ug17/results.xls
.../<Company-name/<system_2/ug17/results.txt
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_ug17_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. compaq_apc_ug17_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- For submissions using Windows operating systems:
- Each submission must
disclose the value of the horizontal and vertical dimensions
in millimeters as reported by the Microsoft
Windows devcaps structure. A utility for obtaining
these dimensions will be provided to any submitter
requiring it.
- The minimum acceptable horizontal dimension for
a nominal 17" diagonal 4:3 ratio CRT monitor is
320mm. The minimum acceptable vertical dimension
for a nominal 17" diagonal 4:3 ratio CRT monitor
is 240mm. For other monitors, the horizontal and
vertical dimensions reported by the devcaps structure
must be no smaller than 10% less than the calculated
dimensions based on the monitor aspect ratio and
stated diagonal dimension.
- The formula to calculate the minimum horizontal
dimension H, based on aspect ratio R, (calculated
as height/width), and diagonal dimension D is: H
= 0.9 * D * cos( arctan(R) ). The formula to calculate
the minimum vertical dimension V, based on aspect
ratio R, (calculated as height/width), and diagonal
dimension D is: V = 0.9 * D * sin( arctan(R) ).
If D is expressed in inches, H and V must be converted
to millimeters by multiplying them by 25.4. The
final dimension must be rounded to the nearest millimeter.
Thus for a 15" screen with a 4:3 aspect ratio, the
minimum horizontal dimension would be calculated
as 0.9 * 25.4 * 15 * cos(arctan( 3/4)), which rounds
to 274mm, and the minimum vertical dimension would
be 0.9 * 25.4 * 15 * sin(arctan( 3/4)), which rounds
to 206mm.
- Solidworks2001�
- The benchmark must be run using the version of Solidworks2001� specified
on the SPECapc website two weeks prior to the submission
deadline.
- The color depth in the windows used by Solidworks2001�
must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels x 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the results.txt file generated
by running the benchmark..
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/sw2001/results.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/sw2001/results.txt
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_sw2001_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. compaq_apc_sw2001_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Solid Edge V10
- The benchmark must be run using Solid Edge V10.0.0.50
- The benchmark machine must have Microsoft Excel installed.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Solid Edge must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The application can be run with "Tools->Options->Application
Display" set to either "Backing store," or "Graphics
card driven." The choice must be documented in the notes
portion of the results.
- Application settings must not be changed from the
defaults set by the benchmark installation.
Settings that must not be changed include, but
are not limited to:
- Culling
- Wireframe display in Move Part command
- Arc smoothness (3)
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the SolidEdge_Result.txt
and the 1532Times.xls files that are generated during
the benchmark process.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/SEV10/SolidEdge_Result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/SEV10/1532Times.xls
.../<Company-name/<system_2/SEV10/SolidEdge_Result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/SEV10/1532Times.xls
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_SolidEdgeV10_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. hp_apc_SolidEdgeV10_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- 3ds max 4.2.6*
- The benchmark is supported on Windows 2000 only.
- The benchmark must be run using 3ds max 4.2.6.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
3ds max 4.2.6 must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The application windows will be visible as specified:
- The "3D Studio MAX R4.2.6" window is maximized
and fills the screen
(The window is not occluded by any other windows.)
- The command panel is visible and docked on the
right.
(The command panel is in the default UI position).
- Drivers and custom drivers must be configured (explicitly
or implicitly) to use:
- GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER = GL_LINEAR_MIPMAP_LINEAR
GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER = GL_LINEAR
- Textures cannot be touched, i.e. not reduced in
size or depth.
- Wireframe objects must NOT be drawn using triangle
strips.
- Wireframe objects must be drawn with anti-aliased
lines.
- The following Viewport parameters must be checked
in the Viewport tab found in the 3ds max 4.2.6 Customize
-> Preferences menu:
- Backface cull on object creation
- Mask viewport to safe region
- Update background while playing
- Display world axis
- The following Viewport parameters must NOT be checked
in the Viewport tab found in the 3ds max 4.2.6 Customize
-> Preferences menu
- Attenuate lights
- Filter environment backgrounds
- The submission must contain the results file "generic.txt"
as well as the corresponding jpeg image "land.jpg" that
resulted from running the benchmark.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/3dsmax426/generic.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/3dsmax426/land.jpg
.../<Company-name/<system_2/3dsmax426/generic.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/3dsmax426/land.jpg
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_3ds_max_426_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. ibm_apc_3dsmax426_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Solid Edge V11
- The benchmark must be run using Solid Edge V11.0.0.50
- The benchmark machine must have Microsoft Excel installed.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Solid Edge must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The application can be run with Tools-Options-Application
Display set to either Backing store or Graphics card
driven. The choice must be documented in the notes portion
of the results.
- Application settings must not be changed from the
defaults set by the benchmark installation.
Settings that must not be changed include, but
are not limited to:
- Culling
- Wireframe display in Move Part command
- Arc smoothness (3)
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the SolidEdge_Result.txt
and the 1532Times.xls files that are generated during
the benchmark process.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/SEV11/SolidEdge_Result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/SEV11/1532Times.xls
.../<Company-name/<system_2/SEV11/SolidEdge_Result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/SEV11/1532Times.xls
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_SolidEdgeV11_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. hp_apc_SolidEdgeV11_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Solidworks2001Plus�
- The benchmark must be run using
Solidworks2001Plus� service pack 0.
- The color depth in the windows used by Solidworks2001�
must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels x 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the results.txt file generated
by running the benchmark..
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/sw2001plus/results.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/sw2001plus/results.txt
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_sw2001plus_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. compaq_apc_sw2001plus_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Pro/Engineer* 2001
- The benchmark must be run using the datecode version
of Pro/ENGINEER 2001 specified on the SPECapc website
two weeks prior to the submission deadline.
- The config.pro file must be used as-is and may not
be modified or overridden.
- The script files utilities\runbench.bat or utilities/runbench.csh
may be modified as necessary to enable execution of
the benchmark on the system being tested. If modified,
the modified version must be included in the benchmark
submission.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Pro/ENGINEER must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the proe_result.txt file
(as generated by the proescore program) as well as the
corresponding trail.txt file generated from running
the benchmark. Both of these files may be found in the
"results" directory after a successful run of the benchmark.
The first section of the proe_result.txt file may be
edited to reflect the system configuration.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe2001/proe_result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe2001/trail.txt
(may be compressed)
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe2001/runbench.bat
(or runbench.csh, if modified, as required by Rule 5.15.c)
.../<Company-name/<system_2/proe2001/proe_result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/proe2001/trail.txt
(may be compressed)
.../<Company-name/<system_1/proe2001/runbench.bat
(or runbench.csh, if modified, as required by Rule 5.15.c)
etc...
- Compression may be accomplished using UN*X compress(1),
tar -Z or zip. The reviewer may ask the submitter to
supply an uncompressed version of the trail file(s).
- The submission file must be named company_apc_proe2001_vN.zip
or company_apc_proe2001_vN.tar.z where
company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. sgi_apc_proe2001_v0.tar.z and intel_apc_proe2001_v0.zip.)
The initial submission is v0. Resubmitted files must
have the version number incremented.
- Solid Edge V12
- The benchmark must be run using Solid Edge V12.0.0.66
- The benchmark machine must have Microsoft Excel installed.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Solid Edge must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels by 1024 pixels.
- The application can be run with Tools-Options-Application
Display set to either Backing store or Graphics card
driven. The choice must be documented in the notes portion
of the results.
- Application settings must not be changed from the
defaults set by the benchmark installation.
Settings that must not be changed include, but
are not limited to:
- Culling
- Wireframe display in Move Part command
- Arc smoothness (3)
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the SolidEdge_Result.txt
and the 1532Times.xls files that are generated during
the benchmark process.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/SEV12/SolidEdge_Result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/SEV12/1532Times.xls
.../<Company-name/<system_2/SEV12/SolidEdge_Result.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/SEV12/1532Times.xls
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_SolidEdgeV12_vN.zip
where company is the member company or organization
name in lower case and vN is the file version
(e.g. hp_apc_SolidEdgeV12_v0.zip.) The initial submission
is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version number
incremented.
- Solidworks 2003
- The benchmark must be run using Solidworks2003� service
pack 3.1.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Solidworks2003� must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels x 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The submission must contain the results.txt file generated
by running the benchmark.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/sw2003/results.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_2/sw2003/results.txt
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_sw2003_vN.zip
where company is the member company or
organization name in lower case and vN is the
file version (e.g. ibm_apc_sw2003_v0.zip.) The initial
submission is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version
number incremented.
- Maya 5.0
- The benchmark must be run using Maya 5.0.
- The color depth in the 3D graphics windows used by
Maya 5.0 must be at least 24 bits (true color).
- The displayed raster resolution must be at least 1280
pixels x 1024 pixels.
- The monitor refresh rate must be at least 75Hz. This
requirement does not apply to digital flat panel displays.
- The border width of the windows created during the
benchmark shall not exceed 10 pixels.
- The benchmark script must be run with the command
'mayaTest(3)' where '3' is the number of runs.
- The submission must contain the results.txt submission
file as well as the scoring spreadsheet used to calculate
the result.
- The directory structure of the submission must
be as follows:
.../<Company-name/<system_1/maya50/results.txt
.../<Company-name/<system_1/maya50/MayaResults.xls
etc...
- The submission file must be named company_apc_maya50_vN.zip
where company is the member company or
organization name in lower case and vN is the
file version (e.g. ibm_apc_maya50_v0.zip.) The initial
submission is v0. Resubmitted files must have the version
number incremented.
- Adoption
Adopted 15 October 2003
|
|